Portfolio Closes Up Shop and Credit Suisse Gets it Right

Its practically common knowledge that magazines and newspapers are in
survival mode with the way advertising budgets are pared down. So I
wasn’t surprised to learn my subscription to Conde Nast’s Portfolio was
coming to an end. It was very helpful for me, a blog writer, in coming
up with ideas. For instance, this past month it ran a piece about how Credit Suisse is paying bonuses. Here is the excerpt I really like:

So is there a better way? Credit ­Suisse,
a Swiss bank that has weathered the credit crisis better than most,
created an ingenious and gratifying solution to the problem of outsize
pay for Wall Street failure. It decided late last year to pay out part
of its bonuses in toxic assets. On Wall Street, the old saying is that
you “eat what you kill.” In this case, Credit Suisse is making its
employees eat their own garbage.

What’s satisfying about
Credit Suisse’s plan is that it shows that investment banks are capable
of learning and bowing to outside pressure. Bonuses on average at the
bank were down 44 percent in 2008 compared with 2007, and employees in
the investment-banking division took a greater hit relative to others.
Bankers at Credit Suisse did get about half of their bonuses in cash,
but instead of stock, top employees, including all the managing
directors (except for the very top dogs, who received no bonus at all
last year), received an interest in what the bank is calling the PAF,
the Partner Asset Facility. It’s made up of assets the bank valued at
just over $5 billion after roughly $2.6 billion in write-downs—meaning
that the employees got assets worth about 65 cents on the dollar.

Notably,
that valuation is surely higher than what the assets would get if they
were sold in the market right now. The great question about all these
illiquid assets currently on bank balance sheets—one which goes to the
heart of whether Treasury Secretary Tim Geith­ner’s bank-rescue plan
will work—is what are they worth? Is the market setting fire-sale
prices that don’t reflect their actual value, or are they truly
impaired? The banks argue that the market has become temporarily
irrational and that the prices it’s setting don’t represent the assets’
true value. In recent years, this hasn’t been an argument as much as a
desperate belief. At least in Credit Suisse’s case, it’s putting its
money where its beliefs (and employees’ mouths) are.

This seems like such a simple way to both placate your employees (who
doesn’t want a bonus) and the tax paying public. Plus I like the idea
of particular products being part of the portfolio of the bonus. It
ensures a real belief in what you are selling.

Working Thoughts 05/14/09
Oil Attention

About benleeson
My name is Ben Leeson. I currently work for a large financial company in IT. I went to school at Marist College in Poughkeepsie, NY. I graduated with a B.S. in Business Administration concentrating in HR. Professor William Brown taught me and I enjoyed his classes; even acquiring an appreciation for just about all things HR. I didn’t pursue a job in that field after college but I’ve kept up with it. This blog will further my fascination with all things HR. I hope to grow my knowledge of the area through thoughtful writings and spirited feedback. I will attempt to have a fairly routine style so anyone reading can come to expect certain segments. Please excuse my incorrect grammar and occasional misspelling.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: