<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Working Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://workingthoughts.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://workingthoughts.com</link>
	<description>View Work Differently</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 13:17:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Marina Keegan Leaves an Essence</title>
		<link>http://workingthoughts.com/2012/05/30/marinakeegan/</link>
		<comments>http://workingthoughts.com/2012/05/30/marinakeegan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 13:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Leeson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Admin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dreams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graduation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marina Keegen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schooling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Success]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingthoughts.com/?p=849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s graduation time. May and June are filled with speeches, reflection, and change. Perhaps it fits with the circle of life &#8211; the birds are ready to leave the nest? I don&#8217;t know. But every year I&#8217;m impressed with the thoughtfulness conveyed in the different commencement speeches and the wonderment of the soon to be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s graduation time. May and June are filled with speeches, reflection, and change. Perhaps it fits with the circle of life &#8211; the birds are ready to leave the nest? I don&#8217;t know. But every year I&#8217;m impressed with the thoughtfulness conveyed in the different commencement speeches and the wonderment of the soon to be former students.</p>
<p>The world is <span style="text-decoration: underline;">ahead of them</span>. They <span style="text-decoration: underline;">know</span> it. And they terrifyingly <span style="text-decoration: underline;">own</span> it.</p>
<p>These thoughts are shared by Marina Keegan. Below is an excellent snippet from <a title="Song for the Special" href="http://www.yaledailynews.com/news/2011/sep/09/keegan-song-special/">Song for the Specia</a>l, a remarkable essay of hers.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: courier new,courier;">Everyone thinks they’re special – my grandma for her Marlboro commercials, my parents for discos and the moon. You can be anything, they tell us. No one else is quite like you. But I searched my name on Facebook and got eight tiny pictures staring back. The Marina Keegans with their little hometowns and relationship statuses. When we die, our gravestones will match. Here Lies Marina Keegan, they will say. Numbers one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight.</span></p>
<p>And here is another from <a title="Opposite of Loneliness" href="http://www.yaledailynews.com/news/2012/may/27/keegan-opposite-loneliness/?cross-campus">The Opposite of Loneliness</a> which she wrote upon graduating.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: courier new,courier;">For most of us, however, we’re somewhat lost in this sea of liberal arts. Not quite sure what road we’re on and whether we should have taken it. If only I had majored in biology…if only I’d gotten involved in journalism as a freshman…if only I’d thought to apply for this or for that…</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: courier new,courier;">What we have to remember is that we can still do anything. We can change our minds. We can start over. Get a post-bac or try writing for the first time. The notion that it’s too late to do anything is comical. It’s hilarious. We’re graduating college. We’re so young. We can’t, we MUST not lose this sense of possibility because in the end, it’s all we have.</span></p>
<p>Read these two short essays. Read them now.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p><a title="Obit" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/30/business/marina-keegan-journalist-and-playwright-dies-at-22.html?smid=pl-share">Marina Keegan</a> imagined the world ahead of her. She wrote of being scared she&#8217;d never do anything. The feeling of a life without meaning. Of being scared she has nothing to put on her business card.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div id="attachment_853" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Marina-Keegan.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-853 " title="Marina Keegan - Director of Possibility" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Marina-Keegan.jpg" alt="Life is Short" width="300" height="168" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Marina Keegan - Director of Possibility</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingthoughts.com/2012/05/30/marinakeegan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spotting Innovative Talent &#8211; External and Internal to Your Company</title>
		<link>http://workingthoughts.com/2012/03/08/spotting-innovative-talent-external-and-internal-to-your-company/</link>
		<comments>http://workingthoughts.com/2012/03/08/spotting-innovative-talent-external-and-internal-to-your-company/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 04:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Leeson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Curiousity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dreams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hiring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[startup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Success]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingthoughts.com/?p=834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The job market is a lagging indicator for the economy. And over the last several months, readings from each of the different national surveys have been positive. To accompany those reports is an underlying uptick in stories about how to hire innovative personnel. These individuals will always command a market for their skills, so its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The job market is a lagging indicator for the economy. And over the last several months, readings from each of the different national surveys have been positive. To accompany those reports is an underlying uptick in stories about how to hire innovative personnel. These individuals will always command a market for their skills, so its especially important to have a plan for this talent. Here are a couple articles I found valuable.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<div id="attachment_838" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 189px"><a href="http://www.emergenetics.com/about-us/corporate-management/geil-browning-ph-d"><img class="size-full wp-image-838" title="Geil" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/geil.jpg" alt="" width="179" height="202" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Geil Browning</p></div>
<p>Inc.com ran an article titled <a href="http://www.inc.com/geil-browning/how-to-identify-innovative-new-hires.html">How to Spot Innovative Hires</a> by Geil Browning. In it she has a few recommendations:</p>
<p>In resumes: Look for &#8220;I enjoy developing solutions that are fresh and new,&#8221; &#8220;I&#8217;m an idea person,&#8221; or &#8220;I&#8217;m a visionary.&#8221; She also suggests that you don&#8217;t be scared off by stops in different industries.</p>
<p>In the interview: Observe who the person is making connections in their mind. When explaining a point or telling a story they seem to go off on a tangent, be OK with that. They are most likely connecting the dots in their minds &#8211; creating associations. They&#8217;ll also pepper the conversation with terms like brainstorming, big picture, global, vision, hunch, oneness, synchronicity, and cutting edge.</p>
<p>Here are a few blurbs from the piece regarding Interview questions to ask:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-family: times new roman,times;">If you were to assemble a piece of furniture from the directions, how would you go about it?</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman,times;">I love this question because each thinking type answers it so differently. Someone whose thinking is very innovative will often say, &#8220;I look at the picture on the box, dump the pieces in a pile on the floor, and then begin. When the project is complete, I use the directions to start a fire.&#8221;</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-family: times new roman,times;">When a deadline is a month away, how do you finish a project—and when?</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman,times;">An innovative thinker will say something like, &#8220;First, I search the Internet for ideas. Then I&#8217;ll take a walk or ponder until a solution makes itself known. This may happen immediately or it may happen three days before the deadline, but when the solution surfaces, it will come all at once—and it will come.&#8221;</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-family: times new roman,times;">What would you do if you showed up ten minutes early for a meeting?</span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman,times;">Does this individual talk about striking up a conversation with the nearest person, or quietly prepare for the meeting? Only you know which trait would offer an appropriate balance at your company.</span></p>
<hr style="width: 2px; border-width: 1px; border-style: solid; border-color: #CCCCCC; color: #ffffff;" noshade="noshade" width="2" />
<hr style="width: 4px;" width="4" />
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<div id="attachment_839" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 130px"><a href="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Bonnstetter-Bros-e1331181720629.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-839" title="Bonnstetter Bros" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Bonnstetter-Bros-e1331181791984.png" alt="" width="120" height="120" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Bill J. Bonnstetter &amp; Ron J. Bonnstetter</p></div>
<p>The Harvard Business Review is providing some guidance about how to identify the people who in your organization are the entrepreneurs. In a blog post titled <a href="http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2012/02/who_are_your_organizations_ent.html">Who are Your Organization&#8217;s Entrepreneurs?</a> Bill J. Bonnstetter and Ron J. Bonnstetter label the problem solvers within the company as Entrepreneurial-Minded People (EMPs) and Serial Entrepreneurs (SEs). The risk they see is in the likeliness of an entrepreneur leaving the team. An interesting stat is that 42% of of entrepreneurs have determined they want to own their own business before the age of 12, so companies are facing tough odds.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: times new roman,times;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Entrepreneurial-Minded People (EMPs)</span>: They tend to work well in teams, have an organized workplace and enjoy consistency. These individuals are happier within organizations or within a group of people working together to achieve a goal.</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: times new roman,times;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Serial Entrepreneurs (SEs)</span>: The second group is made up of potential serial entrepreneurs who have a desire to own their own business. Serial entrepreneurs tend to be more individualistic, have a greater sense of urgency and a desire to control. They have demonstrated an ability to sustain a business past the first year, into the higher growth job production years of a young firm. </span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: times new roman,times;">But how do managers identify entrepreneurial types? It&#8217;s often helpful to put these questions to use, especially during the hiring process or a performance review.</span></p>
<blockquote>
<ol style="padding-left: 30px;">
<li><span style="font-family: times new roman,times;"><strong>Describe your career goals. </strong>The EMP&#8217;s answer would more likely indicate he could care less about being in management and is happy where he is or where he is applying for. The SE will tend to say she is looking for advancement.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: times new roman,times;"><strong>Describe your professional strengths.</strong> An EMP will focus on strengths directly related to the job in question. An SE will talk more about leadership and personal identity.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: times new roman,times;"><strong>Describe things you&#8217;re not good at.</strong> Honesty is important for both. Listen closely: If she claims to not have any weaknesses, she is likely more SE-driven. The more weaknesses he confesses to having, the more EM-driven he is.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: times new roman,times;"><strong>What activities do you do to keep current in your profession?</strong> The EMP is interested in keeping up within his profession and industry. The SE is more focused on keeping up on broader scope, going beyond just her career and may discuss things she is reading, experiencing or sharing.</span></li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: times new roman,times;">Entrepreneurs — whether EMPs or serial — already possess the behaviors, attitudes, and values to build successful businesses. Finding out whom within the workforce possesses the traits of an entrepreneur — and which type they are — will allow business leaders to work with their unique approach to business. Recruiting and retaining entrepreneurs will pay big dividends not just for individual companies, but also for the economy as a whole.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingthoughts.com/2012/03/08/spotting-innovative-talent-external-and-internal-to-your-company/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using Computers to Empower Curious Students</title>
		<link>http://workingthoughts.com/2012/02/18/using-computers-to-empower-curious-students/</link>
		<comments>http://workingthoughts.com/2012/02/18/using-computers-to-empower-curious-students/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 03:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Leeson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Skills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Curiousity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homework]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schooling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingthoughts.com/?p=821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week I posted about a low cost computer called Raspberry Pi and how the benefits of cheap computing are enormous. At a $25 price point you&#8217;re able to be curious, try new things, and make mistakes without costly consequences. Its high upside and low downside. A few days later the NY Times ran [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week I posted about <a title="Raspberry Pi Post" href="http://workingthoughts.com/2012/02/12/low-cost-options-to-develop-computer-skills/">a low cost computer</a> called Raspberry Pi and how the benefits of cheap computing are enormous. At a $25 price point you&#8217;re able to be curious, try new things, and make mistakes without costly consequences. Its high upside and low downside.</p>
<p>A few days later the <a title="Moorseville Students using Computers to Stoke Curiousity" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/13/education/mooresville-school-district-a-laptop-success-story.html">NY Times ran a story</a> about a local community of mine. <a title="Moorseville, NC Wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mooresville,_North_Carolina">Moorseville, NC</a> is a town located to the north of Charlotte. Its on the perimeter of the Charlotte metro area near Lake Norman. They&#8217;ve seen some success with using Apple devices as learning instruments. Now, of course there isn&#8217;t anything new about that.</p>
<p>What is new, is the way they&#8217;re being used. The students are not dependent on teacher prescribed lesson plans. The lessons are part of the computers and the kids are encouraged to problem solve individually, with teams, or by working with a teacher. The students are trusted to drive the learning.</p>
<p><a href="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/MOORESVILLE-4-articleLarge.jpg"><img class=" wp-image-823 aligncenter" title="MOORESVILLE LEARNING" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/MOORESVILLE-4-articleLarge.jpg" alt="" width="525" height="298" /></a></p>
<p><a title="Arne Duncan" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arne_Duncan">Arne Duncan</a>, the Secretary of Education, was on <a title="The Daily Show Home Page" href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/">The Daily Show with Jon Stewart</a> and the host made a valid point &#8211; teaching is an art, not a science. And like any other form of art, the artist must be allowed to create. The instructor can&#8217;t control, only guide. Here&#8217;s a blurb from the article:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: times new roman,times; color: #000080;">“You have to trust kids more than you’ve ever trusted them,” he said. “Your teachers have to be willing to give up control.”</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">
<span style="font-family: times new roman,times; color: #000080;"> That was the primary concern that the 60 visitors expressed during their daylong sojourn to Mooresville in November. “I’m not sure our kids can be trusted the way these are,” one teacher from the Midwest said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to avoid trouble back home.</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">
<span style="font-family: times new roman,times; color: #000080;"> Thomas Bertrand, superintendent of schools in Rochester, Ill., said he was struck by the “culture of collaboration among staff and kids” in Mooresville and would emphasize that as his district considered its own conversion.</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">
<span style="font-family: times new roman,times; color: #000080;"> “There’s a tendency in teaching to try to control things, like a parent,” said Scott Allen, a high school chemistry teacher in South Granville, N.C. “But I learn best at my own pace, and you have to realize that students learn best at their own pace, too.”</span></p>
<p>Programs like this are exciting to me. They show an open mind and a realization that the world has changed. Below are the videos of Arne Duncan with Jon Stewart.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div style="background-color: #000000; width: 520px;">
<div style="padding: 4px;"><iframe src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:cms:video:thedailyshow.com:408603" frameborder="0" width="512" height="288"></iframe></p>
<p style="text-align: left; background-color: #ffffff; padding: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 0px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-february-16-2012/exclusive---arne-duncan-extended-interview-pt--1">The Daily Show with Jon Stewart</a></strong><br />
Get More: <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/">Daily Show Full Episodes</a>,<a href="http://www.indecisionforever.com/">Political Humor &amp; Satire Blog</a>,<a href="http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow">The Daily Show on Facebook</a></p>
</div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: #000000; width: 520px;">
<div style="padding: 4px;"><iframe src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:cms:video:thedailyshow.com:408604" frameborder="0" width="512" height="288"></iframe></p>
<p style="text-align: left; background-color: #ffffff; padding: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 0px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-february-16-2012/exclusive---arne-duncan-extended-interview-pt--2">The Daily Show with Jon Stewart</a></strong><br />
Get More: <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/">Daily Show Full Episodes</a>,<a href="http://www.indecisionforever.com/">Political Humor &amp; Satire Blog</a>,<a href="http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow">The Daily Show on Facebook</a></p>
</div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: #000000; width: 520px;">
<div style="padding: 4px;"><iframe src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:cms:video:thedailyshow.com:408605" frameborder="0" width="512" height="288"></iframe></p>
<p style="text-align: left; background-color: #ffffff; padding: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 0px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-february-16-2012/exclusive---arne-duncan-extended-interview-pt--3">The Daily Show with Jon Stewart</a></strong><br />
Get More: <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/">Daily Show Full Episodes</a>,<a href="http://www.indecisionforever.com/">Political Humor &amp; Satire Blog</a>,<a href="http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow">The Daily Show on Facebook</a></p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingthoughts.com/2012/02/18/using-computers-to-empower-curious-students/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Low Cost Options to Develop Computer Skills</title>
		<link>http://workingthoughts.com/2012/02/12/low-cost-options-to-develop-computer-skills/</link>
		<comments>http://workingthoughts.com/2012/02/12/low-cost-options-to-develop-computer-skills/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Leeson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Skills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Premature Scaling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Success]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingthoughts.com/?p=808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Six years ago a project launched called One Laptop Per Child with the aim of creating an inexpensive low power laptop for children in third world countries. They&#8217;ve sold over 2.5 million units at a cost of around $200. That&#8217;s success. Having computer skills enables upward mobility. Another endeavor is launching at the end of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Six years ago a project launched called <a title="One Laptop Per Child" href="http://one.laptop.org/">One Laptop Per Child</a> with the aim of creating an inexpensive low power laptop for children in third world countries. They&#8217;ve sold over 2.5 million units at a cost of around $200. That&#8217;s success.</p>
<p>Having computer skills enables upward mobility.</p>
<p>Another endeavor is launching at the end of the month (Feb 2012) called <a title="Raspberry Pi Home Page" href="http://www.raspberrypi.org/">Raspberry Pi</a>. This group is <a title="What can a $25 computer do?" href="http://www.theinfoboom.com/articles/raspberry-pi-what-can-a-25-computer-do/">releasing two very low cost computers</a> at price points of $25 and $35.  They don&#8217;t come with a keyboard or a monitor and they are a bare bones assembly. They are aimed at <a title="FAQ Raspberry Pi" href="http://www.raspberrypi.org/faqs">hobbyists and educational use</a>.</p>
<p>I really like how they&#8217;ve fashioned the device &#8211; it has one USB port so you need to use a USB hub to add components, it runs on Linux, and it uses SD cards as a substitute for a hard drive and it boots from it. It can play Hi-Def video via HDMI and is said to be as good as the first X-Box.</p>
<p>The cost is so low that they can be used for many different purposes. Projects in schools or at start ups can certainly use a hardware solution like this to creatively experiment to achieve different learning goals.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Here are some pics of the different computers:</p>
<p><a href="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/512px-Raspberry_Pi_Beta_Board.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-809 aligncenter" title="512px-Raspberry_Pi_Beta_Board" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/512px-Raspberry_Pi_Beta_Board.jpg" alt="Raspberry Pi Computer" width="512" height="288" /></a></p>
<p>The Raspberry Pi doesn&#8217;t come with a case. It has different connections available and is cheap enough to mess with.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Raspberry-Pi-Computer.png"><img class=" wp-image-810 aligncenter" title="Raspberry Pi Computer" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Raspberry-Pi-Computer.png" alt="Raspberry Pi  Layout" width="515" height="675" /></a></p>
<p>Here is the layout of the different components.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/OLPC-XO-300x273.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-811 aligncenter" title="OLPC-XO-300x273" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/OLPC-XO-300x273.jpg" alt="Original OLPC " width="300" height="273" /></a></p>
<p>The One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) original laptop. It uses 5 watts of power and has a hand crank to add power. The latest version is using only 2 watts of power and will work well with solar energy sources.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/HH28JA-CHECKOUT-XO3.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-812 aligncenter" title="HH28JA-CHECKOUT-XO3" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/HH28JA-CHECKOUT-XO3.jpg" alt="Tablet OLPC" width="463" height="308" /></a></p>
<p>The latest OLPC is a tablet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingthoughts.com/2012/02/12/low-cost-options-to-develop-computer-skills/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>December 2011 Jobs Report and Wages</title>
		<link>http://workingthoughts.com/2012/01/13/december-2011-jobs-report-and-wages/</link>
		<comments>http://workingthoughts.com/2012/01/13/december-2011-jobs-report-and-wages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 13:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Leeson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingthoughts.com/?p=791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are the job market and compensation numbers for December 2011 (based on the job report): * Net gain of 200,000 jobs in the month - Analysts expected an overall gain of 150,000 - Private sector payrolls increased by 212,000       – Private sector service providing industries added 164,000 jobs       – Private sector goods [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div>Here are the job market and compensation numbers for <strong>December 2011</strong> (based on the job report):</div>
<div>*</div>
<p>Net <strong>gain</strong> of 200,000 jobs in the month</p>
<div>- Analysts expected an overall gain of 150,000<br />
- Private sector payrolls increased by 212,000</div>
<div>      – Private sector service providing industries added 164,000 jobs</div>
<div>      – Private sector goods producing industries gained 48,000 jobs</div>
<div>- November was revised from a gain of 100,000<br />
- October was revised to a gain of 112,000 from a gain of 80,000 and a revision of 100,000</div>
<div>- For 2011 1.6 million jobs were added, 1.9 million private sector jobs</div>
<div>     – The number of jobs added in 2010 was 940,000<br />
- The labor force in the US is currently 153,887 million, down from 153,937 from an amended November 2011<br />
- The unemployed totaled 13.1 million, down from 13.3 million last month<br />
- 5.6 million had have been jobless for six months or longer<br />
- 42.5% of the unemployed are long term unemployed<br />
- Payroll processing company ADP (a separate report) said private-sector payrolls grew by 325,000 jobs; the largest gain since December 2010.</div>
<div>      – Analysts thought it would be 180,000</div>
<div>      – According to ADP, small firms, with payrolls ranging from one to 49 employees and thought by many to be the engine of job growth, led the charge, adding 148,000 jobs (added 60,000 two months ago)</div>
<div>      – Again, according to ADP, medium-sized businesses, with payrolls between 50 and 499 employees, added 140,000 jobs in the month (added 36,000 two months ago), while the nation’s largest businesses added 37,000 jobs.</div>
<div>      – Of the 206,000 private sector-jobs added in the month, 28,000 of them came from the goods-producing sector and 178,000 jobs were added in the service providing industries</div>
<div>– The announced jobs cuts for December were 41,785</div>
<div>      – The number of announced cuts for the 12 months of the year is 606,082 , surpassing 2010 year end total (529,973) and 14% higher overall</div>
<div>     &#8211; There were 1,288,030 announced job cuts in 2009</div>
<div>*</div>
<div>Unemployment rate <strong>dropped </strong>to 8.5%</div>
<div></div>
<div>- Analysts predicted it would remain at 8.7%</div>
<div>- Lowest rate recorded since March 2009</div>
<div>- Dropped 0.6% since August 2011</div>
<div>- Its a combination of more workers getting jobs and about 315,000 workers dropped out of the labor force<br />
- the civilian labor force participation rate was 64.0 percent, same as last month</div>
<div>- The employment-population ratio was 58.5 percent, same as last month</div>
<div>- The U-6 report, which is a broader group to count (workers who are part time but want to be full time and discouraged worker), dropped in line with the Unemployment rate to 15.2%, it was 16.6% in December 2010</div>
<div>- PMI, a measure of manufacturing pace, is 53.9% and the 29th consecutive month of readings over 50 percent. Anything above 50% means the machines are running</div>
<div>- Service sector activity fell to 52.6%. It was the 25th straight month of growth and anything over 50% signifies growth</div>
<p>*</p>
<div>Specific Segment Job numbers:</div>
<p>- Manufacturing <em>gained</em> 23,000 jobs<br />
- Construction <em>gained</em> 17,000 jobs<br />
- Retailers <em>gained</em> 27,900 jobs<br />
- Leisure and Hospitality Services <em>gained</em> 21,000 jobs<br />
- Government sector lost 12,000: 14,000 loss in local government<br />
- Education and Health Services <em>gained</em> 28,700<br />
- Health Care and Social Assistance <em>grew</em> by 27,000<br />
- Professional and Business Services <em>grew</em> by 12,000<br />
- Temporary help <em>lost</em> 7,500</p>
<p>*</p>
<p>Wage (can be revised):</p>
<p>- The average weekly paycheck (seasonally adjusted) is $658.50<br />
- The average hourly earning (seasonally adjusted) is $19.54, unchanged<br />
- Average weekly hours and overtime of production and nonsupervisory employees on private nonfarm payrolls by industry sector, seasonally adjusted is 34.4</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bls.gov/home.htm">Bureau of Labor Statistics</a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingthoughts.com/2012/01/13/december-2011-jobs-report-and-wages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>November 2011 Jobs Report and Wages</title>
		<link>http://workingthoughts.com/2012/01/02/november-2011-jobs-report-and-wages/</link>
		<comments>http://workingthoughts.com/2012/01/02/november-2011-jobs-report-and-wages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Leeson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hiring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingthoughts.com/?p=761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are the job market and compensation numbers for November 2011 (based on the job report): * Net gain of 120,000 jobs in the month - Analysts expected an overall gain of 110,000 - Private sector payrolls increased by 140,000       &#8211; Private sector service providing industries added 146,000 jobs       &#8211; Private sector goods [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Here are the job market and compensation numbers for <strong>November 2011</strong> (based on the job report):</div>
<div>*</div>
<p>Net <strong>gain</strong> of 120,000 jobs in the month</p>
<div>- Analysts expected an overall gain of 110,000<br />
- Private sector payrolls increased by 140,000</div>
<div>      &#8211; Private sector service providing industries added 146,000 jobs</div>
<div>      &#8211; Private sector goods producing industries lost 6,000 jobs</div>
<div>- September was revised from a gain of 158,000 to to a gain of 210,000<br />
- October was revised from a gain of 80,000 to a gain of 100,000<br />
- Revisions added 72,000 jobs from the prior 2 month readings and the revisions have consistently been higher than original readings<br />
- The labor force in the US is currently 153,883 million, down from 154,198 in October 2011<br />
- The unemployed totaled 13.3 million, down from 14 million which was the number for most of year<br />
- 5.7 million had have been jobless for six months or longer &#8211; relatively unchanged from October (since the recession began 8.8 million jobs were lost and less than a third have been recovered)<br />
- 43.0% of the unemployed are long term unemployed<br />
- Payroll processing company ADP said private-sector payrolls grew by 206,000</div>
<div>      &#8211; According to ADP, small firms, with payrolls ranging from one to 49 employees and thought by many to be the engine of job growth, led the charge, adding 110,000 jobs (added 60,000 two months ago)</div>
<div>      &#8211; Again, according to ADP, medium-sized businesses, with payrolls between 50 and 499 employees, added 84,000 jobs in the month (added 36,000 two months ago), while the nation&#8217;s largest businesses added 12,000 jobs.</div>
<div>      &#8211; Of the 206,000 private sector-jobs added in the month, 28,000 of them came from the goods-producing sector and 178,000 jobs were added in the service providing industries</div>
<div>      &#8211; The announced jobs cuts for November were 42,474</div>
<div>      &#8211; The number of announced cuts for the 11 months of the year is 564,297 , surpassing 2010 year end total and 13% higher overall</div>
<div>- In the first nine months of the year, about 17.3 million people left their jobs by choice</div>
<div>     &#8211; Up 9% from last year, when  just under 16 million people called it quits through September</div>
<div>*</div>
<div>Unemployment rate <strong>dropped </strong>to 8.6%</div>
<div>- Analysts predicted it would remain at 9.1%</div>
<div>- Lowest rate recorded since March 2009</div>
<div>- Its a combination of more workers getting jobs and about 315,000 workers dropped out of the labor force<br />
- the civilian labor force participation rate was 64.0 percent</div>
<div>- The employment-population ratio was 58.5 percent, up slightly from 58.3 percent in September</div>
<div>- The U-6 report, which is a broader group to count (workers who are part time but want to be full time and discouraged worker), dropped in line with the Unemployment rate to 15.6%</div>
<div>- PMI, a measure of manufacturing pace, is 52.7% an increase from 50.8% and the 28th consecutive month of readings over 50 percent. Anything above 50% means the machines are running</div>
<div>- Service sector activity fell to 52.0%. It was the 24th straight month of growth and anything over 50% signifies growth</div>
<p>*</p>
<div>Specific Segment Job numbers:</div>
<p>- Manufacturing <em>gained</em> 2,000 jobs<br />
- Construction <em>lost</em> 12,000 jobs<br />
- Retailers <em>gained</em> 49,800 jobs<br />
- Leisure and Hospitality Services <em>gained</em> 22,000 jobs<br />
- Government sector lost 20,000: 11,000 loss in local government<br />
- Education and Health Services <em>gained</em> 45,000<br />
- Health Care and Social Assistance <em>grew</em> by 27,000<br />
- Professional and Business Services <em>grew</em> by 33,000<br />
- Temporary help gained 22,300</p>
<p>*</p>
<p>Wage (can be revised):</p>
<p>- The average weekly paycheck (seasonally adjusted) is $656.54<br />
- The average hourly earning (seasonally adjusted) is $19.54<br />
- Average weekly hours and overtime of production and nonsupervisory employees on private nonfarm payrolls by industry sector, seasonally adjusted is 33.6</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bls.gov/home.htm">Bureau of Labor Statistics</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingthoughts.com/2012/01/02/november-2011-jobs-report-and-wages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Give to Charity Day!</title>
		<link>http://workingthoughts.com/2011/12/30/give-to-charity-day/</link>
		<comments>http://workingthoughts.com/2011/12/30/give-to-charity-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 15:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Leeson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingthoughts.com/?p=774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today is the last business day of 2011. Any loose ends need to be tied up, especially for tax purposes. I recommend people do two things, go to your bank accounts and make sure all tax applicable changes are completed and go to your favorite charity and donate. It&#8217;s tax deductible. To help with the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today is the last business day of 2011. Any loose ends need to be tied up, especially for tax purposes. I recommend people do two things, go to your bank accounts and make sure all tax applicable changes are completed and go to your favorite charity and donate. It&#8217;s tax deductible.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">To help with the second item, I supplied a couple of links below. One is to donorschoose.org and the other is to a NY Times article recapping several great causes. What I like about them is their connection to the beneficiary. Immediate positive feedback tends to reinforce behavior and if the behavior is donating to a charity, well then all the better. Also, at the very bottom is a story of Donors Choose told by Charles Best, the founder. Its a 3 minutes well spent.</p>
<div id="attachment_775" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 446px"><a href="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Students-and-thank-you.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-775" title="Students Saying Thank You" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Students-and-thank-you.jpg" alt="" width="436" height="177" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Thank You</p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a title="Donors Choose Website" href="http://donorschoose.org">Donorchoose.org </a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/jj_noplaceforkids1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-777" title="no place for kids" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/jj_noplaceforkids1.jpg" alt="" width="306" height="171" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a title="Giving Where it Counts" href="http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/29/giving-where-it-works/?nl=todaysheadlines&amp;emc=thab1">Giving Where It Counts</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><object id="embedded_player_6c7f2781a2af7" width="512" height="313" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="TRUE" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="base" value="http://video.fastcompany.com" /><param name="src" value="http://video.fastcompany.com/plugins/player.swf?v=6c7f2781a2af7&amp;p=fc_social" /><embed id="embedded_player_6c7f2781a2af7" width="512" height="313" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://video.fastcompany.com/plugins/player.swf?v=6c7f2781a2af7&amp;p=fc_social" allowfullscreen="TRUE" allowscriptaccess="always" base="http://video.fastcompany.com" /></object></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingthoughts.com/2011/12/30/give-to-charity-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>October 2011 Jobs Report and Wages</title>
		<link>http://workingthoughts.com/2011/12/27/october-2011-jobs-report-and-wages/</link>
		<comments>http://workingthoughts.com/2011/12/27/october-2011-jobs-report-and-wages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 01:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Leeson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hiring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingthoughts.com/?p=766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are the job market and compensation numbers for October 2011 (based on the job report): Net gain of 80,000 jobs in the month (revised to a gain of 100,000) - Analysts expected an overall gain of 98,000 - Private sector payrolls increased by 104,000       &#8211; Private sector service providing industries added 114,000 jobs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Here are the job market and compensation numbers for <strong>October 2011</strong> (based on the job report):</div>
<p>Net <strong>gain</strong> of 80,000 jobs in the month (revised to a gain of 100,000)</p>
<div>- Analysts expected an overall gain of 98,000<br />
- Private sector payrolls increased by 104,000</div>
<div>      &#8211; Private sector service providing industries added 114,000 jobs</div>
<div>      &#8211; Private sector goods producing industries lost 10,000 jobs</div>
<div>- September was revised from a gain of 103,000 to a gain of 158,000 (final revision to a gain of 210,000)<br />
- August was revised from a gain of 57,000 to a gain of 104,000 (final)<br />
- The labor force in the US is currently 154198 million<br />
- The unemployed totaled 13.9 million, down from 14 million which was the number for most of year<br />
- 5.9 million have been jobless for six months or longer, a drop of 366,000<br />
- 42.4% of the unemployed are long term unemployed<br />
- Payroll processing company ADP said private-sector payrolls grew by 110,000</div>
<div>      &#8211; According to ADP, small firms, with payrolls ranging from one to 49 employees and thought by many to be the engine of job growth, led the charge, adding 58,000 jobs</div>
<div>      &#8211; Again, according to ADP, medium-sized businesses, with payrolls between 50 and 499 employees, added 53,000 jobs in the month, while the nation&#8217;s largest businesses lost 1,000 jobs.</div>
<div>      &#8211; Of the 110,000 private sector-jobs added in the month, 114,000 of them came from the service-providing sector and a loss of 4,000 jobs in the goods producing industries</div>
<div>- The announced jobs cuts for November were 42,759</div>
<div>*</div>
<div>Unemployment rate <strong>dropped </strong>to 9.0%</div>
<div>- Analysts predicted it would remain at 9.1%</div>
<div>- the civilian labor force participation rate was 64.2 percent</div>
<div>- The employment-population ratio was 58.4 percent, up slightly from 58.3 percent in September</div>
<div>- The U-6 report, which is a broader group to count (workers who are part time but want to be full time and discouraged worker), dropped in line with the Unemployment rate to 16.2%</div>
<div>- PMI, a measure of manufacturing pace, is 50.8%, the 27th consecutive month of readings over 50 percent. Anything above 50% means the machines are running</div>
<div>- Service sector activity fell to 52.9%. It was the 23th straight month of growth and anything over 50% signifies growth</div>
<div>*</div>
<div>Specific Segment Job numbers:</div>
<p>- Manufacturing <em>gained</em> 5,000 jobs<br />
- Construction <em>lost</em> 20,000 jobs<br />
- Retailers <em>gained</em> 17,800 jobs<br />
- Leisure and Hospitality Services <em>gained</em> 22,000 jobs<br />
- Government sector lost 24,000: 20,000 loss in state government<br />
- Education and Health Services <em>gained</em> 28,000<br />
- Health Care and Social Assistance <em>grew</em> by 16,300<br />
- Professional and Business Services <em>grew</em> by 32,000<br />
- Temporary help gained 15,000</p>
<p>Wage (can be revised):</p>
<p>- The average weekly paycheck (seasonally adjusted) is $658.16<br />
- The average hourly earning (seasonally adjusted) is $19.53<br />
- Average weekly hours and overtime of production and nonsupervisory employees on private nonfarm payrolls by industry sector, seasonally adjusted is 33.7</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bls.gov/home.htm">Bureau of Labor Statistics</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingthoughts.com/2011/12/27/october-2011-jobs-report-and-wages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big Government and Little Hope</title>
		<link>http://workingthoughts.com/2011/11/19/big-government-and-little-hope/</link>
		<comments>http://workingthoughts.com/2011/11/19/big-government-and-little-hope/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Leeson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingthoughts.com/?p=744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;We need to reduce the size of government.&#8221; is a phrase said by many politicians. But what does it mean? Here are some charts and graphs to try to better understand it (numbers are as of September 2011): Chart 1: Percentage of Non-Farm Employment. Government comprises just under 17% of the total, with only 2.138% [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We need to reduce the size of government.&#8221; is a phrase said by many politicians. But what does it mean?</p>
<p>Here are some charts and graphs to try to better understand it (numbers are as of September 2011):</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Chart 1</span>: Percentage of Non-Farm Employment.</p>
<p><a href="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Percentage-of-Employment-v3.jpg"><img class="size-large wp-image-749 aligncenter" title="Percentage of Employment v3" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Percentage-of-Employment-v3-1024x789.jpg" alt="" width="620" height="477" /></a></p>
<p>Government comprises just under 17% of the total, with only 2.138% being Federal employment. And that includes the Post Office. This is about a 5:1 ratio of Private Employment to Government Employment.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Food-and-Beverage-to-Fed-Employment.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-751" title="Food and Beverage to Fed Employment" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Food-and-Beverage-to-Fed-Employment-300x248.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="248" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The Federal Government employs about the same number of people as the Food and Beverage Stores Industry (your local grocery and liquor store).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Chart 2</span>: Distribution of Government jobs between Local, State, and Federal levels.</p>
<p><a href="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Distribution-of-Gov-Jobs-v1.jpg"><img class="size-large wp-image-754 aligncenter" title="Distribution of Gov Jobs v1" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Distribution-of-Gov-Jobs-v1-1024x757.jpg" alt="" width="620" height="458" /></a></p>
<p>In terms of hiring, total government has <strong><em>lost 116,000</em></strong> jobs since January 2007 (Local has lost 202,000, State has lost 5,000 and Federal has gained 91,000 jobs). In terms of distribution, the Local level has lost about 0.5% and the Federal level has gained about 0.5%. The major uptick in the spring of 2010 at the Federal level was due to the once a decade census, which employs temporary workers to collect population data.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> Chart 3</span>: Since the summer of 2007, the Government has increased employment to a 2% gain over January 2007 levels, with a spike to 4% for the census. However, as the private sector has started to hire in the spring of 2010, the Government has lost the 4% gain it had accumulated, tempering the potential economic lift of a larger employment base.</p>
<p><a href="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Private-to-Gov-Jobs-Loss-with-ratio-v1.jpg"><img class="size-large wp-image-757 aligncenter" title="Private to Gov Jobs Loss with ratio v1" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Private-to-Gov-Jobs-Loss-with-ratio-v1-1024x380.jpg" alt="" width="682" height="230" /></a></p>

<a href='http://workingthoughts.com/2011/11/19/big-government-and-little-hope/percentage-of-employment-v2/' title='Percentage of Employment v2'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Percentage-of-Employment-v2-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="Percentage of Employment v2" title="Percentage of Employment v2" /></a>
<a href='http://workingthoughts.com/2011/11/19/big-government-and-little-hope/percentage-of-employment-v3/' title='Percentage of Employment v3'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Percentage-of-Employment-v3-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="Percentage of Employment v3" title="Percentage of Employment v3" /></a>
<a href='http://workingthoughts.com/2011/11/19/big-government-and-little-hope/food-and-beverage-to-fed-employment/' title='Food and Beverage to Fed Employment'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Food-and-Beverage-to-Fed-Employment-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="Food and Beverage to Fed Employment" title="Food and Beverage to Fed Employment" /></a>
<a href='http://workingthoughts.com/2011/11/19/big-government-and-little-hope/distribution-of-gov-jobs-v1/' title='Distribution of Gov Jobs v1'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Distribution-of-Gov-Jobs-v1-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="Distribution of Gov Jobs v1" title="Distribution of Gov Jobs v1" /></a>
<a href='http://workingthoughts.com/2011/11/19/big-government-and-little-hope/private-to-gov-jobs-loss-with-ratio-v1/' title='Private to Gov Jobs Loss with ratio v1'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Private-to-Gov-Jobs-Loss-with-ratio-v1-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="Private to Gov Jobs Loss with ratio v1" title="Private to Gov Jobs Loss with ratio v1" /></a>

<p>Also, note, these charts do not control for population growth. The numbers are worse when that is factored in (between 100,000 and 150,000 people added to the public a month)</p>
<p>So back to the statement: &#8220;We need to reduce the size of government.&#8221; Its really about reducing the influence of government. The size of it, excluding the military, is actually relatively small. From a business standpoint, time is money. And often dealing with government agencies can take time. Is some of it bureaucracy? Absolutely. And much of it is from a failure to anticipate. This creates a reactionary problem solving paradigm that most often is meant to protect the interests of the community, but usually results in an approval after a long delay.</p>
<p>Doing away with the agency isn&#8217;t the solution. The solution is to get them to find patterns which quick reviews can be judged against and with a means to handle exceptions. Somewhat like &#8220;If these 5 predetermined criteria are satisfied, then you&#8217;re all set.&#8221; The old 80/20 split.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingthoughts.com/2011/11/19/big-government-and-little-hope/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One Long Corridor or Beautiful Design, Uniqueness, Perseverance, and User Engagement</title>
		<link>http://workingthoughts.com/2011/11/12/one-long-corridor-or-beautiful-design-uniqueness-perseverance-and-user-engagement/</link>
		<comments>http://workingthoughts.com/2011/11/12/one-long-corridor-or-beautiful-design-uniqueness-perseverance-and-user-engagement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 05:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Leeson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Off Target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingthoughts.com/?p=738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you ever been in a building with long halls that stretch and then turn. It always seems to be well lit where you&#8217;re standing and dim where the turn is. And when you reach the turn the new corridor looks the exact same? The exact same. And these are the times when no one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever been in a building with long halls that stretch and then turn. It always seems to be well lit where you&#8217;re standing and dim where the turn is. And when you reach the turn the new corridor looks the exact same? The exact same. And these are the times when no one else is around so it&#8217;s quiet. It&#8217;s like an eery movie. But we&#8217;ve all been there.</p>
<p>I say this for a figurative reason and an illustrative one.</p>
<p>Figuratively, that is what this economy feels like. Month after month its a new hall that looks like the month before. Its a puzzle we are stuck in trying to find our way out.</p>
<p>But to find our way out we need new approaches. This economic situation is now structural in nature. That means it requires new skills and new dominions. During this transitional phase a lot of people will continue to lose jobs or be unable to find them.</p>
<p>What we need more of are people like Zi Ye and Jesse Burstyn of Toasty Games who developed a fantastical game called Parallax.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m amazed by it on several levels. The first is the aesthetics. They are eye popping. The second is in the blending of space and dimension (I like <a href="http://www.nintendo.com/sites/spm/#">Paper Mario</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatland">Flatland</a> as well). And the third is the drive to create a game to be both challenging and fun. All three of these are characteristics of what the next economy is going to need: Beautiful Design, Uniqueness, Perseverance, and User Engagement.</p>
<p><object style="height: 390px; width: 640px;" width="640" height="360" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rcLkABnd9pY?version=3&amp;feature=player_embedded" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed style="height: 390px; width: 640px;" width="640" height="360" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rcLkABnd9pY?version=3&amp;feature=player_embedded" allowFullScreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" /></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingthoughts.com/2011/11/12/one-long-corridor-or-beautiful-design-uniqueness-perseverance-and-user-engagement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
