<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Working Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://workingthoughts.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://workingthoughts.com</link>
	<description>View Work Differently</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 03:04:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Using Computers to Empower Curious Students</title>
		<link>http://workingthoughts.com/2012/02/18/using-computers-to-empower-curious-students/</link>
		<comments>http://workingthoughts.com/2012/02/18/using-computers-to-empower-curious-students/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 03:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Leeson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Skills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Curiousity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homework]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schooling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingthoughts.com/?p=821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week I posted about a low cost computer called Raspberry Pi and how the benefits of cheap computing are enormous. At a $25 price point you&#8217;re able to be curious, try new things, and make mistakes without costly consequences. Its high upside and low downside. A few days later the NY Times ran [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week I posted about <a title="Raspberry Pi Post" href="http://workingthoughts.com/2012/02/12/low-cost-options-to-develop-computer-skills/">a low cost computer</a> called Raspberry Pi and how the benefits of cheap computing are enormous. At a $25 price point you&#8217;re able to be curious, try new things, and make mistakes without costly consequences. Its high upside and low downside.</p>
<p>A few days later the <a title="Moorseville Students using Computers to Stoke Curiousity" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/13/education/mooresville-school-district-a-laptop-success-story.html">NY Times ran a story</a> about a local community of mine. <a title="Moorseville, NC Wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mooresville,_North_Carolina">Moorseville, NC</a> is a town located to the north of Charlotte. Its on the perimeter of the Charlotte metro area near Lake Norman. They&#8217;ve seen some success with using Apple devices as learning instruments. Now, of course there isn&#8217;t anything new about that.</p>
<p>What is new, is the way they&#8217;re being used. The students are not dependent on teacher prescribed lesson plans. The lessons are part of the computers and the kids are encouraged to problem solve individually, with teams, or by working with a teacher. The students are trusted to drive the learning.</p>
<p><a href="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/MOORESVILLE-4-articleLarge.jpg"><img class=" wp-image-823 aligncenter" title="MOORESVILLE LEARNING" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/MOORESVILLE-4-articleLarge.jpg" alt="" width="525" height="298" /></a></p>
<p><a title="Arne Duncan" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arne_Duncan">Arne Duncan</a>, the Secretary of Education, was on <a title="The Daily Show Home Page" href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/">The Daily Show with Jon Stewart</a> and the host made a valid point &#8211; teaching is an art, not a science. And like any other form of art, the artist must be allowed to create. The instructor can&#8217;t control, only guide. Here&#8217;s a blurb from the article:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="font-family: times new roman,times; color: #000080;">“You have to trust kids more than you’ve ever trusted them,” he said. “Your teachers have to be willing to give up control.”</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">
<span style="font-family: times new roman,times; color: #000080;"> That was the primary concern that the 60 visitors expressed during their daylong sojourn to Mooresville in November. “I’m not sure our kids can be trusted the way these are,” one teacher from the Midwest said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to avoid trouble back home.</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">
<span style="font-family: times new roman,times; color: #000080;"> Thomas Bertrand, superintendent of schools in Rochester, Ill., said he was struck by the “culture of collaboration among staff and kids” in Mooresville and would emphasize that as his district considered its own conversion.</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">
<span style="font-family: times new roman,times; color: #000080;"> “There’s a tendency in teaching to try to control things, like a parent,” said Scott Allen, a high school chemistry teacher in South Granville, N.C. “But I learn best at my own pace, and you have to realize that students learn best at their own pace, too.”</span></p>
<p>Programs like this are exciting to me. They show an open mind and a realization that the world has changed. Below are the videos of Arne Duncan with Jon Stewart.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div style="background-color: #000000; width: 520px;">
<div style="padding: 4px;"><iframe src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:cms:video:thedailyshow.com:408603" frameborder="0" width="512" height="288"></iframe></p>
<p style="text-align: left; background-color: #ffffff; padding: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 0px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-february-16-2012/exclusive---arne-duncan-extended-interview-pt--1">The Daily Show with Jon Stewart</a></strong><br />
Get More: <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/">Daily Show Full Episodes</a>,<a href="http://www.indecisionforever.com/">Political Humor &amp; Satire Blog</a>,<a href="http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow">The Daily Show on Facebook</a></p>
</div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: #000000; width: 520px;">
<div style="padding: 4px;"><iframe src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:cms:video:thedailyshow.com:408604" frameborder="0" width="512" height="288"></iframe></p>
<p style="text-align: left; background-color: #ffffff; padding: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 0px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-february-16-2012/exclusive---arne-duncan-extended-interview-pt--2">The Daily Show with Jon Stewart</a></strong><br />
Get More: <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/">Daily Show Full Episodes</a>,<a href="http://www.indecisionforever.com/">Political Humor &amp; Satire Blog</a>,<a href="http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow">The Daily Show on Facebook</a></p>
</div>
</div>
<div style="background-color: #000000; width: 520px;">
<div style="padding: 4px;"><iframe src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:cms:video:thedailyshow.com:408605" frameborder="0" width="512" height="288"></iframe></p>
<p style="text-align: left; background-color: #ffffff; padding: 4px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 0px; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;"><strong><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-february-16-2012/exclusive---arne-duncan-extended-interview-pt--3">The Daily Show with Jon Stewart</a></strong><br />
Get More: <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/">Daily Show Full Episodes</a>,<a href="http://www.indecisionforever.com/">Political Humor &amp; Satire Blog</a>,<a href="http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow">The Daily Show on Facebook</a></p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingthoughts.com/2012/02/18/using-computers-to-empower-curious-students/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Low Cost Options to Develop Computer Skills</title>
		<link>http://workingthoughts.com/2012/02/12/low-cost-options-to-develop-computer-skills/</link>
		<comments>http://workingthoughts.com/2012/02/12/low-cost-options-to-develop-computer-skills/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 03:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Leeson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer Skills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Premature Scaling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Success]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingthoughts.com/?p=808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Six years ago a project launched called One Laptop Per Child with the aim of creating an inexpensive low power laptop for children in third world countries. They&#8217;ve sold over 2.5 million units at a cost of around $200. That&#8217;s success. Having computer skills enables upward mobility. Another endeavor is launching at the end of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Six years ago a project launched called <a title="One Laptop Per Child" href="http://one.laptop.org/">One Laptop Per Child</a> with the aim of creating an inexpensive low power laptop for children in third world countries. They&#8217;ve sold over 2.5 million units at a cost of around $200. That&#8217;s success.</p>
<p>Having computer skills enables upward mobility.</p>
<p>Another endeavor is launching at the end of the month (Feb 2012) called <a title="Raspberry Pi Home Page" href="http://www.raspberrypi.org/">Raspberry Pi</a>. This group is <a title="What can a $25 computer do?" href="http://www.theinfoboom.com/articles/raspberry-pi-what-can-a-25-computer-do/">releasing two very low cost computers</a> at price points of $25 and $35.  They don&#8217;t come with a keyboard or a monitor and they are a bare bones assembly. They are aimed at <a title="FAQ Raspberry Pi" href="http://www.raspberrypi.org/faqs">hobbyists and educational use</a>.</p>
<p>I really like how they&#8217;ve fashioned the device &#8211; it has one USB port so you need to use a USB hub to add components, it runs on Linux, and it uses SD cards as a substitute for a hard drive and it boots from it. It can play Hi-Def video via HDMI and is said to be as good as the first X-Box.</p>
<p>The cost is so low that they can be used for many different purposes. Projects in schools or at start ups can certainly use a hardware solution like this to creatively experiment to achieve different learning goals.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Here are some pics of the different computers:</p>
<p><a href="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/512px-Raspberry_Pi_Beta_Board.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-809 aligncenter" title="512px-Raspberry_Pi_Beta_Board" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/512px-Raspberry_Pi_Beta_Board.jpg" alt="Raspberry Pi Computer" width="512" height="288" /></a></p>
<p>The Raspberry Pi doesn&#8217;t come with a case. It has different connections available and is cheap enough to mess with.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Raspberry-Pi-Computer.png"><img class=" wp-image-810 aligncenter" title="Raspberry Pi Computer" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Raspberry-Pi-Computer.png" alt="Raspberry Pi  Layout" width="515" height="675" /></a></p>
<p>Here is the layout of the different components.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/OLPC-XO-300x273.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-811 aligncenter" title="OLPC-XO-300x273" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/OLPC-XO-300x273.jpg" alt="Original OLPC " width="300" height="273" /></a></p>
<p>The One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) original laptop. It uses 5 watts of power and has a hand crank to add power. The latest version is using only 2 watts of power and will work well with solar energy sources.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/HH28JA-CHECKOUT-XO3.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-812 aligncenter" title="HH28JA-CHECKOUT-XO3" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/HH28JA-CHECKOUT-XO3.jpg" alt="Tablet OLPC" width="463" height="308" /></a></p>
<p>The latest OLPC is a tablet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingthoughts.com/2012/02/12/low-cost-options-to-develop-computer-skills/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>December 2011 Jobs Report and Wages</title>
		<link>http://workingthoughts.com/2012/01/13/december-2011-jobs-report-and-wages/</link>
		<comments>http://workingthoughts.com/2012/01/13/december-2011-jobs-report-and-wages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 13:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Leeson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingthoughts.com/?p=791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are the job market and compensation numbers for December 2011 (based on the job report): * Net gain of 200,000 jobs in the month - Analysts expected an overall gain of 150,000 - Private sector payrolls increased by 212,000       – Private sector service providing industries added 164,000 jobs       – Private sector goods [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div>Here are the job market and compensation numbers for <strong>December 2011</strong> (based on the job report):</div>
<div>*</div>
<p>Net <strong>gain</strong> of 200,000 jobs in the month</p>
<div>- Analysts expected an overall gain of 150,000<br />
- Private sector payrolls increased by 212,000</div>
<div>      – Private sector service providing industries added 164,000 jobs</div>
<div>      – Private sector goods producing industries gained 48,000 jobs</div>
<div>- November was revised from a gain of 100,000<br />
- October was revised to a gain of 112,000 from a gain of 80,000 and a revision of 100,000</div>
<div>- For 2011 1.6 million jobs were added, 1.9 million private sector jobs</div>
<div>     – The number of jobs added in 2010 was 940,000<br />
- The labor force in the US is currently 153,887 million, down from 153,937 from an amended November 2011<br />
- The unemployed totaled 13.1 million, down from 13.3 million last month<br />
- 5.6 million had have been jobless for six months or longer<br />
- 42.5% of the unemployed are long term unemployed<br />
- Payroll processing company ADP (a separate report) said private-sector payrolls grew by 325,000 jobs; the largest gain since December 2010.</div>
<div>      – Analysts thought it would be 180,000</div>
<div>      – According to ADP, small firms, with payrolls ranging from one to 49 employees and thought by many to be the engine of job growth, led the charge, adding 148,000 jobs (added 60,000 two months ago)</div>
<div>      – Again, according to ADP, medium-sized businesses, with payrolls between 50 and 499 employees, added 140,000 jobs in the month (added 36,000 two months ago), while the nation’s largest businesses added 37,000 jobs.</div>
<div>      – Of the 206,000 private sector-jobs added in the month, 28,000 of them came from the goods-producing sector and 178,000 jobs were added in the service providing industries</div>
<div>– The announced jobs cuts for December were 41,785</div>
<div>      – The number of announced cuts for the 12 months of the year is 606,082 , surpassing 2010 year end total (529,973) and 14% higher overall</div>
<div>     &#8211; There were 1,288,030 announced job cuts in 2009</div>
<div>*</div>
<div>Unemployment rate <strong>dropped </strong>to 8.5%</div>
<div></div>
<div>- Analysts predicted it would remain at 8.7%</div>
<div>- Lowest rate recorded since March 2009</div>
<div>- Dropped 0.6% since August 2011</div>
<div>- Its a combination of more workers getting jobs and about 315,000 workers dropped out of the labor force<br />
- the civilian labor force participation rate was 64.0 percent, same as last month</div>
<div>- The employment-population ratio was 58.5 percent, same as last month</div>
<div>- The U-6 report, which is a broader group to count (workers who are part time but want to be full time and discouraged worker), dropped in line with the Unemployment rate to 15.2%, it was 16.6% in December 2010</div>
<div>- PMI, a measure of manufacturing pace, is 53.9% and the 29th consecutive month of readings over 50 percent. Anything above 50% means the machines are running</div>
<div>- Service sector activity fell to 52.6%. It was the 25th straight month of growth and anything over 50% signifies growth</div>
<p>*</p>
<div>Specific Segment Job numbers:</div>
<p>- Manufacturing <em>gained</em> 23,000 jobs<br />
- Construction <em>gained</em> 17,000 jobs<br />
- Retailers <em>gained</em> 27,900 jobs<br />
- Leisure and Hospitality Services <em>gained</em> 21,000 jobs<br />
- Government sector lost 12,000: 14,000 loss in local government<br />
- Education and Health Services <em>gained</em> 28,700<br />
- Health Care and Social Assistance <em>grew</em> by 27,000<br />
- Professional and Business Services <em>grew</em> by 12,000<br />
- Temporary help <em>lost</em> 7,500</p>
<p>*</p>
<p>Wage (can be revised):</p>
<p>- The average weekly paycheck (seasonally adjusted) is $658.50<br />
- The average hourly earning (seasonally adjusted) is $19.54, unchanged<br />
- Average weekly hours and overtime of production and nonsupervisory employees on private nonfarm payrolls by industry sector, seasonally adjusted is 34.4</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bls.gov/home.htm">Bureau of Labor Statistics</a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingthoughts.com/2012/01/13/december-2011-jobs-report-and-wages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>November 2011 Jobs Report and Wages</title>
		<link>http://workingthoughts.com/2012/01/02/november-2011-jobs-report-and-wages/</link>
		<comments>http://workingthoughts.com/2012/01/02/november-2011-jobs-report-and-wages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Leeson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hiring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingthoughts.com/?p=761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are the job market and compensation numbers for November 2011 (based on the job report): * Net gain of 120,000 jobs in the month - Analysts expected an overall gain of 110,000 - Private sector payrolls increased by 140,000       &#8211; Private sector service providing industries added 146,000 jobs       &#8211; Private sector goods [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Here are the job market and compensation numbers for <strong>November 2011</strong> (based on the job report):</div>
<div>*</div>
<p>Net <strong>gain</strong> of 120,000 jobs in the month</p>
<div>- Analysts expected an overall gain of 110,000<br />
- Private sector payrolls increased by 140,000</div>
<div>      &#8211; Private sector service providing industries added 146,000 jobs</div>
<div>      &#8211; Private sector goods producing industries lost 6,000 jobs</div>
<div>- September was revised from a gain of 158,000 to to a gain of 210,000<br />
- October was revised from a gain of 80,000 to a gain of 100,000<br />
- Revisions added 72,000 jobs from the prior 2 month readings and the revisions have consistently been higher than original readings<br />
- The labor force in the US is currently 153,883 million, down from 154,198 in October 2011<br />
- The unemployed totaled 13.3 million, down from 14 million which was the number for most of year<br />
- 5.7 million had have been jobless for six months or longer &#8211; relatively unchanged from October (since the recession began 8.8 million jobs were lost and less than a third have been recovered)<br />
- 43.0% of the unemployed are long term unemployed<br />
- Payroll processing company ADP said private-sector payrolls grew by 206,000</div>
<div>      &#8211; According to ADP, small firms, with payrolls ranging from one to 49 employees and thought by many to be the engine of job growth, led the charge, adding 110,000 jobs (added 60,000 two months ago)</div>
<div>      &#8211; Again, according to ADP, medium-sized businesses, with payrolls between 50 and 499 employees, added 84,000 jobs in the month (added 36,000 two months ago), while the nation&#8217;s largest businesses added 12,000 jobs.</div>
<div>      &#8211; Of the 206,000 private sector-jobs added in the month, 28,000 of them came from the goods-producing sector and 178,000 jobs were added in the service providing industries</div>
<div>      &#8211; The announced jobs cuts for November were 42,474</div>
<div>      &#8211; The number of announced cuts for the 11 months of the year is 564,297 , surpassing 2010 year end total and 13% higher overall</div>
<div>- In the first nine months of the year, about 17.3 million people left their jobs by choice</div>
<div>     &#8211; Up 9% from last year, when  just under 16 million people called it quits through September</div>
<div>*</div>
<div>Unemployment rate <strong>dropped </strong>to 8.6%</div>
<div>- Analysts predicted it would remain at 9.1%</div>
<div>- Lowest rate recorded since March 2009</div>
<div>- Its a combination of more workers getting jobs and about 315,000 workers dropped out of the labor force<br />
- the civilian labor force participation rate was 64.0 percent</div>
<div>- The employment-population ratio was 58.5 percent, up slightly from 58.3 percent in September</div>
<div>- The U-6 report, which is a broader group to count (workers who are part time but want to be full time and discouraged worker), dropped in line with the Unemployment rate to 15.6%</div>
<div>- PMI, a measure of manufacturing pace, is 52.7% an increase from 50.8% and the 28th consecutive month of readings over 50 percent. Anything above 50% means the machines are running</div>
<div>- Service sector activity fell to 52.0%. It was the 24th straight month of growth and anything over 50% signifies growth</div>
<p>*</p>
<div>Specific Segment Job numbers:</div>
<p>- Manufacturing <em>gained</em> 2,000 jobs<br />
- Construction <em>lost</em> 12,000 jobs<br />
- Retailers <em>gained</em> 49,800 jobs<br />
- Leisure and Hospitality Services <em>gained</em> 22,000 jobs<br />
- Government sector lost 20,000: 11,000 loss in local government<br />
- Education and Health Services <em>gained</em> 45,000<br />
- Health Care and Social Assistance <em>grew</em> by 27,000<br />
- Professional and Business Services <em>grew</em> by 33,000<br />
- Temporary help gained 22,300</p>
<p>*</p>
<p>Wage (can be revised):</p>
<p>- The average weekly paycheck (seasonally adjusted) is $656.54<br />
- The average hourly earning (seasonally adjusted) is $19.54<br />
- Average weekly hours and overtime of production and nonsupervisory employees on private nonfarm payrolls by industry sector, seasonally adjusted is 33.6</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bls.gov/home.htm">Bureau of Labor Statistics</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingthoughts.com/2012/01/02/november-2011-jobs-report-and-wages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Give to Charity Day!</title>
		<link>http://workingthoughts.com/2011/12/30/give-to-charity-day/</link>
		<comments>http://workingthoughts.com/2011/12/30/give-to-charity-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 15:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Leeson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingthoughts.com/?p=774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today is the last business day of 2011. Any loose ends need to be tied up, especially for tax purposes. I recommend people do two things, go to your bank accounts and make sure all tax applicable changes are completed and go to your favorite charity and donate. It&#8217;s tax deductible. To help with the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today is the last business day of 2011. Any loose ends need to be tied up, especially for tax purposes. I recommend people do two things, go to your bank accounts and make sure all tax applicable changes are completed and go to your favorite charity and donate. It&#8217;s tax deductible.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">To help with the second item, I supplied a couple of links below. One is to donorschoose.org and the other is to a NY Times article recapping several great causes. What I like about them is their connection to the beneficiary. Immediate positive feedback tends to reinforce behavior and if the behavior is donating to a charity, well then all the better. Also, at the very bottom is a story of Donors Choose told by Charles Best, the founder. Its a 3 minutes well spent.</p>
<div id="attachment_775" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 446px"><a href="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Students-and-thank-you.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-775" title="Students Saying Thank You" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Students-and-thank-you.jpg" alt="" width="436" height="177" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Thank You</p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a title="Donors Choose Website" href="http://donorschoose.org">Donorchoose.org </a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/jj_noplaceforkids1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-777" title="no place for kids" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/jj_noplaceforkids1.jpg" alt="" width="306" height="171" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"> <a title="Giving Where it Counts" href="http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/29/giving-where-it-works/?nl=todaysheadlines&amp;emc=thab1">Giving Where It Counts</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><object id="embedded_player_6c7f2781a2af7" width="512" height="313" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="TRUE" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="base" value="http://video.fastcompany.com" /><param name="src" value="http://video.fastcompany.com/plugins/player.swf?v=6c7f2781a2af7&amp;p=fc_social" /><embed id="embedded_player_6c7f2781a2af7" width="512" height="313" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://video.fastcompany.com/plugins/player.swf?v=6c7f2781a2af7&amp;p=fc_social" allowfullscreen="TRUE" allowscriptaccess="always" base="http://video.fastcompany.com" /></object></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingthoughts.com/2011/12/30/give-to-charity-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>October 2011 Jobs Report and Wages</title>
		<link>http://workingthoughts.com/2011/12/27/october-2011-jobs-report-and-wages/</link>
		<comments>http://workingthoughts.com/2011/12/27/october-2011-jobs-report-and-wages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 01:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Leeson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hiring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingthoughts.com/?p=766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are the job market and compensation numbers for October 2011 (based on the job report): Net gain of 80,000 jobs in the month (revised to a gain of 100,000) - Analysts expected an overall gain of 98,000 - Private sector payrolls increased by 104,000       &#8211; Private sector service providing industries added 114,000 jobs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Here are the job market and compensation numbers for <strong>October 2011</strong> (based on the job report):</div>
<p>Net <strong>gain</strong> of 80,000 jobs in the month (revised to a gain of 100,000)</p>
<div>- Analysts expected an overall gain of 98,000<br />
- Private sector payrolls increased by 104,000</div>
<div>      &#8211; Private sector service providing industries added 114,000 jobs</div>
<div>      &#8211; Private sector goods producing industries lost 10,000 jobs</div>
<div>- September was revised from a gain of 103,000 to a gain of 158,000 (final revision to a gain of 210,000)<br />
- August was revised from a gain of 57,000 to a gain of 104,000 (final)<br />
- The labor force in the US is currently 154198 million<br />
- The unemployed totaled 13.9 million, down from 14 million which was the number for most of year<br />
- 5.9 million have been jobless for six months or longer, a drop of 366,000<br />
- 42.4% of the unemployed are long term unemployed<br />
- Payroll processing company ADP said private-sector payrolls grew by 110,000</div>
<div>      &#8211; According to ADP, small firms, with payrolls ranging from one to 49 employees and thought by many to be the engine of job growth, led the charge, adding 58,000 jobs</div>
<div>      &#8211; Again, according to ADP, medium-sized businesses, with payrolls between 50 and 499 employees, added 53,000 jobs in the month, while the nation&#8217;s largest businesses lost 1,000 jobs.</div>
<div>      &#8211; Of the 110,000 private sector-jobs added in the month, 114,000 of them came from the service-providing sector and a loss of 4,000 jobs in the goods producing industries</div>
<div>- The announced jobs cuts for November were 42,759</div>
<div>*</div>
<div>Unemployment rate <strong>dropped </strong>to 9.0%</div>
<div>- Analysts predicted it would remain at 9.1%</div>
<div>- the civilian labor force participation rate was 64.2 percent</div>
<div>- The employment-population ratio was 58.4 percent, up slightly from 58.3 percent in September</div>
<div>- The U-6 report, which is a broader group to count (workers who are part time but want to be full time and discouraged worker), dropped in line with the Unemployment rate to 16.2%</div>
<div>- PMI, a measure of manufacturing pace, is 50.8%, the 27th consecutive month of readings over 50 percent. Anything above 50% means the machines are running</div>
<div>- Service sector activity fell to 52.9%. It was the 23th straight month of growth and anything over 50% signifies growth</div>
<div>*</div>
<div>Specific Segment Job numbers:</div>
<p>- Manufacturing <em>gained</em> 5,000 jobs<br />
- Construction <em>lost</em> 20,000 jobs<br />
- Retailers <em>gained</em> 17,800 jobs<br />
- Leisure and Hospitality Services <em>gained</em> 22,000 jobs<br />
- Government sector lost 24,000: 20,000 loss in state government<br />
- Education and Health Services <em>gained</em> 28,000<br />
- Health Care and Social Assistance <em>grew</em> by 16,300<br />
- Professional and Business Services <em>grew</em> by 32,000<br />
- Temporary help gained 15,000</p>
<p>Wage (can be revised):</p>
<p>- The average weekly paycheck (seasonally adjusted) is $658.16<br />
- The average hourly earning (seasonally adjusted) is $19.53<br />
- Average weekly hours and overtime of production and nonsupervisory employees on private nonfarm payrolls by industry sector, seasonally adjusted is 33.7</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bls.gov/home.htm">Bureau of Labor Statistics</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingthoughts.com/2011/12/27/october-2011-jobs-report-and-wages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big Government and Little Hope</title>
		<link>http://workingthoughts.com/2011/11/19/big-government-and-little-hope/</link>
		<comments>http://workingthoughts.com/2011/11/19/big-government-and-little-hope/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Leeson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingthoughts.com/?p=744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;We need to reduce the size of government.&#8221; is a phrase said by many politicians. But what does it mean? Here are some charts and graphs to try to better understand it (numbers are as of September 2011): Chart 1: Percentage of Non-Farm Employment. Government comprises just under 17% of the total, with only 2.138% [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We need to reduce the size of government.&#8221; is a phrase said by many politicians. But what does it mean?</p>
<p>Here are some charts and graphs to try to better understand it (numbers are as of September 2011):</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Chart 1</span>: Percentage of Non-Farm Employment.</p>
<p><a href="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Percentage-of-Employment-v3.jpg"><img class="size-large wp-image-749 aligncenter" title="Percentage of Employment v3" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Percentage-of-Employment-v3-1024x789.jpg" alt="" width="620" height="477" /></a></p>
<p>Government comprises just under 17% of the total, with only 2.138% being Federal employment. And that includes the Post Office. This is about a 5:1 ratio of Private Employment to Government Employment.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Food-and-Beverage-to-Fed-Employment.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-751" title="Food and Beverage to Fed Employment" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Food-and-Beverage-to-Fed-Employment-300x248.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="248" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The Federal Government employs about the same number of people as the Food and Beverage Stores Industry (your local grocery and liquor store).</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Chart 2</span>: Distribution of Government jobs between Local, State, and Federal levels.</p>
<p><a href="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Distribution-of-Gov-Jobs-v1.jpg"><img class="size-large wp-image-754 aligncenter" title="Distribution of Gov Jobs v1" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Distribution-of-Gov-Jobs-v1-1024x757.jpg" alt="" width="620" height="458" /></a></p>
<p>In terms of hiring, total government has <strong><em>lost 116,000</em></strong> jobs since January 2007 (Local has lost 202,000, State has lost 5,000 and Federal has gained 91,000 jobs). In terms of distribution, the Local level has lost about 0.5% and the Federal level has gained about 0.5%. The major uptick in the spring of 2010 at the Federal level was due to the once a decade census, which employs temporary workers to collect population data.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> Chart 3</span>: Since the summer of 2007, the Government has increased employment to a 2% gain over January 2007 levels, with a spike to 4% for the census. However, as the private sector has started to hire in the spring of 2010, the Government has lost the 4% gain it had accumulated, tempering the potential economic lift of a larger employment base.</p>
<p><a href="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Private-to-Gov-Jobs-Loss-with-ratio-v1.jpg"><img class="size-large wp-image-757 aligncenter" title="Private to Gov Jobs Loss with ratio v1" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Private-to-Gov-Jobs-Loss-with-ratio-v1-1024x380.jpg" alt="" width="682" height="230" /></a></p>

<a href='http://workingthoughts.com/2011/11/19/big-government-and-little-hope/percentage-of-employment-v2/' title='Percentage of Employment v2'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Percentage-of-Employment-v2-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="Percentage of Employment v2" title="Percentage of Employment v2" /></a>
<a href='http://workingthoughts.com/2011/11/19/big-government-and-little-hope/percentage-of-employment-v3/' title='Percentage of Employment v3'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Percentage-of-Employment-v3-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="Percentage of Employment v3" title="Percentage of Employment v3" /></a>
<a href='http://workingthoughts.com/2011/11/19/big-government-and-little-hope/food-and-beverage-to-fed-employment/' title='Food and Beverage to Fed Employment'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Food-and-Beverage-to-Fed-Employment-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="Food and Beverage to Fed Employment" title="Food and Beverage to Fed Employment" /></a>
<a href='http://workingthoughts.com/2011/11/19/big-government-and-little-hope/distribution-of-gov-jobs-v1/' title='Distribution of Gov Jobs v1'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Distribution-of-Gov-Jobs-v1-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="Distribution of Gov Jobs v1" title="Distribution of Gov Jobs v1" /></a>
<a href='http://workingthoughts.com/2011/11/19/big-government-and-little-hope/private-to-gov-jobs-loss-with-ratio-v1/' title='Private to Gov Jobs Loss with ratio v1'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://workingthoughts.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Private-to-Gov-Jobs-Loss-with-ratio-v1-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="Private to Gov Jobs Loss with ratio v1" title="Private to Gov Jobs Loss with ratio v1" /></a>

<p>Also, note, these charts do not control for population growth. The numbers are worse when that is factored in (between 100,000 and 150,000 people added to the public a month)</p>
<p>So back to the statement: &#8220;We need to reduce the size of government.&#8221; Its really about reducing the influence of government. The size of it, excluding the military, is actually relatively small. From a business standpoint, time is money. And often dealing with government agencies can take time. Is some of it bureaucracy? Absolutely. And much of it is from a failure to anticipate. This creates a reactionary problem solving paradigm that most often is meant to protect the interests of the community, but usually results in an approval after a long delay.</p>
<p>Doing away with the agency isn&#8217;t the solution. The solution is to get them to find patterns which quick reviews can be judged against and with a means to handle exceptions. Somewhat like &#8220;If these 5 predetermined criteria are satisfied, then you&#8217;re all set.&#8221; The old 80/20 split.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingthoughts.com/2011/11/19/big-government-and-little-hope/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One Long Corridor or Beautiful Design, Uniqueness, Perseverance, and User Engagement</title>
		<link>http://workingthoughts.com/2011/11/12/one-long-corridor-or-beautiful-design-uniqueness-perseverance-and-user-engagement/</link>
		<comments>http://workingthoughts.com/2011/11/12/one-long-corridor-or-beautiful-design-uniqueness-perseverance-and-user-engagement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 05:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Leeson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Off Target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingthoughts.com/?p=738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you ever been in a building with long halls that stretch and then turn. It always seems to be well lit where you&#8217;re standing and dim where the turn is. And when you reach the turn the new corridor looks the exact same? The exact same. And these are the times when no one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever been in a building with long halls that stretch and then turn. It always seems to be well lit where you&#8217;re standing and dim where the turn is. And when you reach the turn the new corridor looks the exact same? The exact same. And these are the times when no one else is around so it&#8217;s quiet. It&#8217;s like an eery movie. But we&#8217;ve all been there.</p>
<p>I say this for a figurative reason and an illustrative one.</p>
<p>Figuratively, that is what this economy feels like. Month after month its a new hall that looks like the month before. Its a puzzle we are stuck in trying to find our way out.</p>
<p>But to find our way out we need new approaches. This economic situation is now structural in nature. That means it requires new skills and new dominions. During this transitional phase a lot of people will continue to lose jobs or be unable to find them.</p>
<p>What we need more of are people like Zi Ye and Jesse Burstyn of Toasty Games who developed a fantastical game called Parallax.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m amazed by it on several levels. The first is the aesthetics. They are eye popping. The second is in the blending of space and dimension (I like <a href="http://www.nintendo.com/sites/spm/#">Paper Mario</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatland">Flatland</a> as well). And the third is the drive to create a game to be both challenging and fun. All three of these are characteristics of what the next economy is going to need: Beautiful Design, Uniqueness, Perseverance, and User Engagement.</p>
<p><object style="height: 390px; width: 640px;" width="640" height="360" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rcLkABnd9pY?version=3&amp;feature=player_embedded" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed style="height: 390px; width: 640px;" width="640" height="360" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rcLkABnd9pY?version=3&amp;feature=player_embedded" allowFullScreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" /></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingthoughts.com/2011/11/12/one-long-corridor-or-beautiful-design-uniqueness-perseverance-and-user-engagement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;My ideas play and fight all night &#8211; drives me crazy&#8230;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://workingthoughts.com/2011/10/29/my-ideas-play-and-fight-all-night-drives-me-crazy/</link>
		<comments>http://workingthoughts.com/2011/10/29/my-ideas-play-and-fight-all-night-drives-me-crazy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 15:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Leeson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[associations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dreams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Success]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingthoughts.com/?p=729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a few people in my life that seem to have a way with words. I envy them. I recently had lunch with a friend, a friend who seems to imagine a different world. He started to riff: &#8220;My ideas play and fight all night &#8211; drives me crazy.  I wake up and they sleep [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a few people in my life that seem to have a way with words. I envy them.</p>
<p>I recently had lunch with a friend, a friend who seems to imagine a different world. He started to riff:</p>
<p><strong><em>&#8220;My ideas play and fight all night &#8211; drives me crazy.  I wake up and they sleep all day. Time goes by and I get new ones. But sometimes I wonder what the old ideas think of the new ones?&#8221;</em></strong></p>
<p>Who doesn&#8217;t love a story about inspiration and the the &#8220;Aha moment&#8221; that accompanies it? It captivates the audience. What isn&#8217;t as exciting is the follow through that brought the idea to fruition. I know I&#8217;m not alone in toiling with all the things I want to do as I shut down for the night. These dreams need an awakening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingthoughts.com/2011/10/29/my-ideas-play-and-fight-all-night-drives-me-crazy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>September 2011 Jobs Report and Wages</title>
		<link>http://workingthoughts.com/2011/10/15/september-2011-jobs-report-and-wages/</link>
		<comments>http://workingthoughts.com/2011/10/15/september-2011-jobs-report-and-wages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 22:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Leeson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Admin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hiring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs Report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingthoughts.com/?p=685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are the job market and compensation numbers for September 2011 (based on the job report): Net gain of 103,000 jobs in the month (final revision to a gain of 210,000 jobs) - Analysts expected an overall gain of 65,000 - Private sector payrolls increased by 137,000       &#8211; Private sector service providing industries added [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Here are the job market and compensation numbers for <strong>September 2011</strong> (based on the job report):</div>
<div>Net <strong>gain</strong> of 103,000 jobs in the month (final revision to a gain of 210,000 jobs)</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">- Analysts expected an overall gain of 65,000<br />
- Private sector payrolls increased by 137,000</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">      &#8211; Private sector service providing industries added 119,000 jobs</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">      &#8211; Private sector goods producing industries added 18,000 jobs</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">      &#8211; 45,000 of the 137,000 jobs were counted but reflect the end of the Verizon Wireless worker strike<br />
- August was revised to gain of 57,000 from an original reading of zero jobs added/lost<br />
- July was revised to a gain of 127,000 from an original reading of 85,000<br />
- Revisions added 99,000 jobs from prior readings<br />
- The labor force in the US is currently 154,017 million, up slightly from August 2011<br />
- The unemployed totaled 14 million in September and it has remained flat for several months<br />
- 6.2 million had have been jobless for six months or longer &#8211; relatively unchanged from the prior month<br />
- 44.6% of the unemployed are long term unemployed; up 0.2% from last month<br />
- Payroll processing company ADP said private-sector payrolls grew by 91,000</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">      &#8211; According to ADP, small firms, with payrolls ranging from one to 49 employees and thought by many to be the engine of job growth, led the charge, adding 60,000 jobs</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">      &#8211; Again, according to ADP, medium-sized businesses, with payrolls between 50 and 499 employees, added 36,000 jobs in the month, while the nation&#8217;s largest businesses shed 5,000 jobs.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">      &#8211; Of the 91,000 private sector-jobs added in the month, only 1,000 of them came from the goods-producing sector.</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">      &#8211; The announced jobs cuts more than doubled from August to September with a rise from 51,114 in August to 115,730 in September</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">      &#8211; This is the highest number since September 2009 when 132,590 cuts were announced<br />
- Employers have now announced a total of 479,064 planned job cuts so far this year &#8212; up 16.5% from 411,272 cuts at the same time in 2010</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">      &#8211; About 80,000 of the cuts, or nearly 70% of last month&#8217;s total, came from just two organizations: Bank of America and the United States Army</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div>Unemployment rate <strong>remained </strong>at 9.1%</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">- Analysts predicted it would remain at 9.1%<br />
- the civilian labor force participation rate was 64.2 percent- little changed</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">- The employment-population ratio was 58.3 percent &#8211; little changed</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">- The U-6 report, which is a broader group to count (workers who are part time but want to be full time and discouraged worker), rose significantly to 16.5%</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">- Overall consumer prices were up 3.8% over the past year</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">- PMI, a measure of manufacturing pace, is 51.6% a drop from 55.3% and the 26th consecutive month of readings over 50 percent. Anything above 50% means the machines are running</div>
<div style="padding-left: 30px;">- Service sector activity fell to 53.0%. It was the 22th straight month of growth and anything over 50% signifies growth</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div>Specific Segment Job numbers:</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- Manufacturing <em>lost</em> 13,000 jobs<br />
- Construction <em>gained</em> 26,000 jobs<br />
- Retailers <em>gained</em> 13,600 jobs<br />
- Leisure and Hospitality Services <em>lost</em> 4,000 jobs<br />
- Government sector lost 34,000: a 35,000 loss in local government alone<br />
- Education and Health Services <em>gained</em> 45,000<br />
- Health Care and Social Assistance <em>grew</em> by 40,800<br />
- Professional and Business Services <em>grew</em> by 48,000<br />
- Temporary help gained 19,400</p>
<p>Wage (can be revised):</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- The average weekly paycheck (seasonally adjusted) is $655.87, an increase of $2.69<br />
- The average hourly earning (seasonally adjusted) is $19.52<br />
- Average weekly hours and overtime of production and nonsupervisory employees on private nonfarm payrolls by industry sector, seasonally adjusted is 33.5, a slight dip from 33.6 last month</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bls.gov/home.htm">Bureau of Labor Statistics</a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://workingthoughts.com/2011/10/15/september-2011-jobs-report-and-wages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

